What Law Firms Get Wrong About AI and Automation
- Cooper Shattuck

- Jul 6
- 3 min read
It seems like every conversation about legal marketing eventually finds its way back to AI.
There’s a new tool every week, another webinar promising to transform the way firms operate, and plenty of opinions about who is ahead and who is already falling behind. It’s easy to feel like the goal is to automate as much as possible.
We don’t think that’s the goal at all.

The firms getting the most value from AI aren’t replacing the parts of their business that make them different. They’re using it to remove the repetitive work that keeps them from focusing on what matters most. That’s an important distinction, especially when it comes to marketing.
AI Should Support Your Marketing, Not Become Your Marketing
We’ve seen firms become so focused on using AI that they forget what their marketing is supposed to accomplish in the first place.
A website isn’t there just to fill pages with content. A newsletter isn’t successful simply because it goes out every month. A social media post doesn’t have value because it was quick to create.
Each of those things exists to help someone get to know your firm before they ever reach out. They should reflect your attorneys, your perspective, and the way you approach your work. If AI replaces all of that, your marketing may become more efficient, but it likely won’t become more effective.
Don’t Automate the Parts People Actually Care About
One of the biggest advantages a law firm has is that no other firm has the exact same people, experiences, or client stories.
Those are the things that make your content interesting.
When every blog, email, and LinkedIn post is generated the same way, firms start sounding surprisingly alike. The writing is polished, the grammar is perfect, and yet none of it feels particularly memorable because it could belong to almost anyone.
People don’t connect with perfectly optimized marketing. They connect with thoughtful ideas, practical insight, and content that feels like it came from a real person.
Where AI Use Makes the Most Sense
This doesn’t mean your marketing team should avoid AI. Quite the opposite.
Some of the best uses of AI happen behind the scenes, where it saves time without replacing your firm’s voice. It can help organize research, summarize meetings, repurpose a webinar into multiple pieces of content, brainstorm headlines, or create a first draft that your team can shape into something stronger.
Those are the kinds of tasks that often slow marketing down. Letting technology handle some of that work gives your team more time to interview attorneys, plan campaigns, improve your website, and create content that’s genuinely useful.
In other words, AI should make the creative process easier. It shouldn’t become the creative process.
The Goal Has Never Been More Content
One of the unintended side effects of AI is that it’s easier than ever to publish more.
More blogs. More emails. More social posts. But more isn’t necessarily better if every piece sounds like the last one.
The firms that stand out aren’t usually the ones publishing the greatest volume of content. They’re the ones consistently sharing ideas that reflect their experience and give people a reason to trust them.
AI can help you get there faster, but it can’t replace the perspective that makes your firm worth paying attention to in the first place.
A Better Way to Think About AI
Rather than asking how much of your marketing can be automated, ask where automation can give your team more time to do the work only people can do.
The best marketing still comes from conversations with attorneys, real client experiences, and thoughtful strategy. AI is simply another tool that can help bring those ideas to life more efficiently. That’s where we see firms getting it right.

.png)


